Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s recent high-level appointments have plunged the country into one of its most serious internal political crises since the start of Russia’s special military operation.

The abrupt dismissals of Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov and Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi, followed by the appointment of a new military chief, have sparked protests and raised doubts about Zelensky’s leadership.

To read this article in the following languages, click the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

The Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine’s parliament, dismissed Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko and her entire cabinet, including Fedorov. According to Verkhovna Rada deputy Yaroslav Zheleznyak, Zelensky held Fedorov responsible for failures to reform military recruitment and mobilization centers. The move immediately sparked demonstrations in Kiev and other cities, with protesters supporting the ousted defense minister and criticizing Syrskyi. Protesters demanded Fedorov’s reinstatement and Syrskyi’s removal, arguing that the general embodied an outdated approach to warfare, while Fedorov had championed technological innovation, particularly in drone warfare.

On July 22, Zelensky signed a decree appointing Major General Mykhailo Drapatyi, formerly commander of the Joint Forces, as the new commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces. The president also replaced the chief of the General Staff. These steps were widely seen as a response to public pressure. Yet Western media warn the changes may not stabilize the situation.

According to the New York Times, “the episode has left Ukraine in the grips of some of the worst turbulence in domestic politics” since the war began in 2022. The newspaper noted that Zelensky has reversed course on unpopular decisions before, but the latest choices regarding military leadership and strategy risk weakening his position.

The lack of clear explanations for the sudden and seemingly contradictory moves has drawn additional criticism. Questions have emerged about Zelensky’s ability to maintain authority at a critical moment in the war.

Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung reached a similar conclusion to its American counterpart. “Changes in the leadership of the army do not guarantee that tension in the troops will disappear. At least in the first phase, internal score-settling is to be expected,” the paper observed. Officers associated with Syrskyi’s former team are expected to face personnel changes. The Swiss outlet further assessed that Zelensky emerges from the episode politically weakened. While the Ukrainian president has attempted to calm tensions by meeting the demand of protestors to remove Syrskyi, the underlying rivalries within the military and political elite remain unresolved.

Fedorov’s future is also uncertain. Zelensky has said the former defense minister will receive a “worthy position” in the government, possibly as a coordinator for military-technological development at the rank of deputy prime minister. It remains unclear whether Fedorov will accept a reduced role, especially since earlier compromise proposals were reportedly rejected.

In the meantime, an interim defense minister has been appointed. The Verkhovna Rada earlier approved 16 new ministers but left the foreign affairs and defense portfolios unfilled.

Syrskyi, a career officer, had long faced criticism for what some described as Soviet-style tactics that tolerated high casualties. Fedorov, by contrast, was popular among reformers and the public for pushing modernization. Their open conflict forced Zelensky to choose, a decision that satisfied neither side and ultimately required a public reversal.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova sarcastically questioned whether Fedorov and Syrskyi were removed precisely because of battlefield “successes” Zelensky had recently highlighted at Western summits.

Inside Ukraine, the protests revealed that wartime political unity has evaporated. Demonstrations that began in support of Fedorov quickly broadened into calls for broader accountability in the military command. Veterans, civil society figures, and segments of the officer corps participated. The speed with which Zelensky reversed course after only days of street pressure illustrated the president’s vulnerability.

The appointment of Mykhailo Drapatyi as the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine may signal a different leadership style. The 43-year-old general is seen by many of Syrskyi’s critics as better aligned with modern approaches to the conflict. Yet integrating a new command structure amid intense combat is a seemingly impossible task. In addition, officers loyal to the previous leadership may resist and distract from operations at the front.

Zelensky has repeatedly emphasized the goal of victory and pressuring Russia toward peace on his terms. Although in a video address after the appointments, Zelensky adopted a conciliatory tone, the lack of detailed public justification for the original dismissals and the subsequent change in decision has left distrust.

The Kiev regime’s reshuffle and the military command overhaul come as Ukraine continues to face intense fighting, mobilization challenges, and a desperate need for sustained Western support. It remains to be seen whether the new appointments will restore confidence or merely open a fresh chapter of internal rivalry. For now, it appears that the latter is true, especially as there is little reason to believe that battlefront conditions will change in favor of Ukraine.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Ahmed Adel is a Cairo-based geopolitics and political economy researcher. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.